D. B. Fowler Publications
 
 
View Papers

Winter Wheat Production on the North Central Canadian Prairies: Potential Quality Classes.
D.B. Fowler and I.A. de la Roche

ABSTRACT

Southwestern Alberta has been traditional winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. production area in western Canada. In recent years, direct seeding of winter wheat into standing stubble has resulted in an extension of this production area to include most of the western Canadian prairies. This study was undertaken to assess the potential quality of winter wheat grown in one section of the expanded production area, namely, the nothcentral part of the agricultural area of Saskatchewan. Three grain quality measurement - kernel hardness, mixograph peak time, and protein concentration - were utilized to evaluate the quality of nine winter wheat cultivars grown in 15 trials and of five winter and four spring wheat cultivars grown in six trials. The cultivars represented a wide range of winter and spring wheat quality classes. Cultivar differences and the cultivar by environment interactions were significant for all three measurements of quality. Environmental effects were also significant for all quality measurements except mixograph peak time. However, for kernel hardess the mixograph peak time, the variability due to cultivars, Variability due to sources other than cultivars was much greater for protein concentration and yield. Higher grain yield of winter wheat, together with apparent environmental limitations to protein production plus possible genetic differences, resulted in lower protein percentages for hard red winter as compared to hard red spring wheat cultivars. On the basis of these observations, no genetic or environmental restrictions are apparent for the production of winter wheat cultivars suitable for all except the highest protein, common wheat quality classes.

Keywords

Triticum aestivum L., Wheat quality, Kernel hardness, Mixography peak time, Percent protein, Protein yield, Genotype by environment interation, Spring wheat.

Fill out the form below to receive a pdf reprint of this paper.

Name:
Email:
WARNING: This file size is 1.78 megabytes. Please make sure your e-mail account has enough space to receive the document.